Skip to main content

PwC ordered to pay $625M in damages over bank’s audit

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP was ordered to pay the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. more than $625 million for negligence in the audit of Colonial BancGroup Inc., an Alabama bank holding company that failed during the financial crisis.
U.S. District Judge Barbara Jacobs Rothstein issued the ruling Monday granting the FDIC’s damages request after she found in December that Pricewaterhouse had failed in its audits of the bank from 2003 to 2005 and for 2008. The firm didn’t design its audits to detect fraud or gather enough evidence of its funding to sign reports for those years, she said.
“PwC US is disappointed by today’s ruling and we don’t believe the FDIC is entitled to the recovery of any damages in this case in light of the Court’s prior findings that numerous employees at Colonial actively and substantially interfered with our audits," said Phil Beck, an attorney for the firm. "We intend to pursue an appeal."
Colonial BancGroup was the parent company of Colonial Bank, which collapsed in 2009 amid a fraud perpetrated by its largest customer, Taylor Bean & Whitaker Mortgage Corp. Former Taylor Bean chairman Lee Farkas and five other Taylor Bean executives were convicted for their roles.
From 2002 through August 2009, Farkas sold more than $1.5 billion in mortgage loans that to Colonial Bank that Taylor Bean had already committed or sold to other investors.
Colonial Bank was the sixth-largest bank failure in U.S. history, and its collapse cost the FDIC’s insurance fund about $4.2 billion. PricewaterhouseCoopers settled similar allegations by the trustee for Taylor Bean in the middle of a trial in Miami, in August 2016.
The PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP logo sits on 51-storey skyscraper Tower 185 as an aircraft flies above in Frankfurt, Germany.
Alex Kraus/Bloomberg
Bloomberg News

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

IFRS FOUNDATION PUBLISHES CASE STUDY REPORT: BETTER COMMUNICATION—MAKING DISCLOSURES MORE MEANINGFUL

The IFRS ®  Foundation has published a case study report showing how companies from different parts of the world have improved communication in their IFRS financial statements.  Better Communication in Financial Reporting—Making disclosures more meaningful  contains six case studies from varied industries. Its aim is to illustrate how improvements can be made and inspire other companies to initiate their own improvement projects. The report explains the process these companies have gone through to improve disclosures in the notes to their IFRS financial statements and shows examples of the improvements made. By identifying what information is relevant, prioritising it appropriately and presenting it in a clear and simple manner, they have made their financial statements easier for investors to read and understand. Through the use of examples, the report shows that relatively small changes can significantly improve the quality of the financial information that compa...

List of IFRIC Interpretations

The IFRS Foundation provides free access (through Basic registration) to the PDF files of the current year's IFRIC ®  Interpretations (Part A of the Issued Standards—the Red Book), as well as available translations of Interpretations. This section also provides high level and non-technical summaries for the Interpretations.  The full Standards with all accompanying documents are available for  Premium subscribers on eIFRS . For more information about what is provided for free and why, visit our unaccompanied Standards FAQ page . Interpretation name IFRIC 1 Changes in Existing Decommissioning, Restoration and Similar Liabilities IFRIC 2 Members’ Shares in Co-operative Entities and Similar Instruments IFRIC 4 Determining whether an Arrangement Contains a Lease IFRIC 5 Rights to Interests arising from Decommissioning, Restoration and Environmental Rehabilitation Funds IFRIC 6 Liabilities arising from Participating in a S...

IFRS Foundation Trustees publish findings on independent perception research

The Trustees of the IFRS ®  Foundation, responsible for the governance and oversight of the International Accounting Standards Board (Board), today published the findings of independent research commissioned to better understand stakeholder attitudes towards the work of the IFRS Foundation and the Board. The research found that the IFRS Foundation is perceived as being successful in achieving its public interest mission, and is highly rated for transparency, independence and professionalism. The research also identifies areas for further development, mainly around the complexity of its Standards, the timeliness of its standard-setting process and the need to respond quickly in a changing world. The research was conducted between February and May 2017 by Ebiquity, an independent research agency. Ebiquity interviewed 50 senior stakeholders from around the world. That research was then supplemented with online surveys of members of the IFRS Foundation’s advisory bod...