Skip to main content

IASB seeks clarity between liabilities and equity

The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) is seeking comment on proposed guidance that seeks to clarify when a financial instrument should be classified as a liability or as equity.
The distinction between liabilities and equity is an important consideration in how companies and other entities present financial information. That’s because the classification of these financial instruments affects how an entity’s financial position and performance are depicted.
An IFRS Standards Discussion Paper published Thursday is designed to address diversity in accounting practices related to International Accounting Standard (IAS) No. 32, Financial Instruments: Presentation, which currently outlines how a company that issues financial instruments should distinguish financial liabilities from equity instruments.
While IAS 32 has worked well for most financial instruments, some companies have found it difficult to classify some complex financial instruments that combine features of both debt (liabilities) and ordinary shares (equity instruments), the IASB said in a statement.
The approach proposed by the IASB would:
  • Provide a clear rationale for why a financial instrument would be classified as either a liability or equity without fundamentally changing the existing classification outcomes of IAS 32.
  • Enhance the information provided through presentation and disclosure.
The Discussion Paper Financial Instruments With Characteristics of Equity is open for comments until Jan. 7.
— Jeff Drew (Jeff.Drew@aicpa-cima.com) is a JofA senior editor.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

List of IFRIC Interpretations

The IFRS Foundation provides free access (through Basic registration) to the PDF files of the current year's IFRIC ®  Interpretations (Part A of the Issued Standards—the Red Book), as well as available translations of Interpretations. This section also provides high level and non-technical summaries for the Interpretations.  The full Standards with all accompanying documents are available for  Premium subscribers on eIFRS . For more information about what is provided for free and why, visit our unaccompanied Standards FAQ page . Interpretation name IFRIC 1 Changes in Existing Decommissioning, Restoration and Similar Liabilities IFRIC 2 Members’ Shares in Co-operative Entities and Similar Instruments IFRIC 4 Determining whether an Arrangement Contains a Lease IFRIC 5 Rights to Interests arising from Decommissioning, Restoration and Environmental Rehabilitation Funds IFRIC 6 Liabilities arising from Participating in a S...
Post a Comment
Explore more »

List of IFRS Standards

The IFRS Foundation provides free access (through Basic registration) to the PDF files of the current year's consolidated IFRS ®  Standards (Part A of the Issued Standards—the Red Book), the  Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting  and IFRS Practice Statements, as well as available translations of Standards. This section also provides high-level and non-technical summaries for the Standards. The full Standards with all accompanying documents are available for  Premium subscribers on eIFRS . For more information about what is provided for free and why, visit our  unaccompanied Standards FAQ page . Standard name Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting IFRS 1 First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards IFRS 2 Share-based Payment IFRS 3 Business Combinations IFRS 4 Insurance Contracts IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations IFRS 6 Exploration for an...
Post a Comment
Explore more »

IFRS Foundation Trustees publish findings on independent perception research

The Trustees of the IFRS ®  Foundation, responsible for the governance and oversight of the International Accounting Standards Board (Board), today published the findings of independent research commissioned to better understand stakeholder attitudes towards the work of the IFRS Foundation and the Board. The research found that the IFRS Foundation is perceived as being successful in achieving its public interest mission, and is highly rated for transparency, independence and professionalism. The research also identifies areas for further development, mainly around the complexity of its Standards, the timeliness of its standard-setting process and the need to respond quickly in a changing world. The research was conducted between February and May 2017 by Ebiquity, an independent research agency. Ebiquity interviewed 50 senior stakeholders from around the world. That research was then supplemented with online surveys of members of the IFRS Foundation’s advisory bod...
Post a Comment
Explore more »