Skip to main content

IASB consults on the accounting for financial instruments with characteristics of equity


The International Accounting Standards Board (Board) today has published for public comment a Discussion Paper on how companies issuing financial instruments should classify them in their financial statements.
IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation currently sets out how a company that issues financial instruments should distinguish financial liabilities from equity instruments. That distinction is important because the classification of the instruments affects how a company’s financial position and performance are depicted.
IAS 32 works well for most financial instruments. However, continuing financial innovation means that some companies find it challenging to classify some complex financial instruments that combine some features of both debt—liabilities—and ordinary shares—equity instruments.
Challenges in classifying these instruments can result in diverse accounting in practice, which in turn makes it difficult for investors to assess and compare companies’ financial position and performance. In addition, investors have been calling for better information, particularly about equity instruments.
The Board has responded to feedback from investors and others and has considered previous work on the topic to propose an approach that would:
  • provide a clear rationale for why a financial instrument would be classified as either a liability or equity without fundamentally changing the existing classification outcomes of IAS 32; and
  • enhance the information provided through presentation and disclosure.
This approach would provide investors with richer and more comparable information about financial instruments issued by companies. Clearer principles will help companies accounting for financial instruments they issue both now and as financial instruments continue to evolve.  
Hans Hoogervorst, Chair of the International Accounting Standards Board, said:
Our approach aims to meet the needs of both investors and companies by providing investors with better information and companies that issue financial instruments with clearer guidance on how to account for those instruments.
The Board is now calling for feedback on this proposed approach to help it further develop a solution.
The Discussion Paper Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Equity is open for comments until 7 January 2019. A Snapshot, providing a top line summary of the document, is also available.
In this video, Board Vice-Chair Sue Lloyd explains the background to the paper and provides a brief summary of the Board’s approach.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

IFRS FOUNDATION PUBLISHES CASE STUDY REPORT: BETTER COMMUNICATION—MAKING DISCLOSURES MORE MEANINGFUL

The IFRS ®  Foundation has published a case study report showing how companies from different parts of the world have improved communication in their IFRS financial statements.  Better Communication in Financial Reporting—Making disclosures more meaningful  contains six case studies from varied industries. Its aim is to illustrate how improvements can be made and inspire other companies to initiate their own improvement projects. The report explains the process these companies have gone through to improve disclosures in the notes to their IFRS financial statements and shows examples of the improvements made. By identifying what information is relevant, prioritising it appropriately and presenting it in a clear and simple manner, they have made their financial statements easier for investors to read and understand. Through the use of examples, the report shows that relatively small changes can significantly improve the quality of the financial information that compa...
Post a Comment
Explore more »

List of IFRIC Interpretations

The IFRS Foundation provides free access (through Basic registration) to the PDF files of the current year's IFRIC ®  Interpretations (Part A of the Issued Standards—the Red Book), as well as available translations of Interpretations. This section also provides high level and non-technical summaries for the Interpretations.  The full Standards with all accompanying documents are available for  Premium subscribers on eIFRS . For more information about what is provided for free and why, visit our unaccompanied Standards FAQ page . Interpretation name IFRIC 1 Changes in Existing Decommissioning, Restoration and Similar Liabilities IFRIC 2 Members’ Shares in Co-operative Entities and Similar Instruments IFRIC 4 Determining whether an Arrangement Contains a Lease IFRIC 5 Rights to Interests arising from Decommissioning, Restoration and Environmental Rehabilitation Funds IFRIC 6 Liabilities arising from Participating in a S...
Post a Comment
Explore more »

IFRS Foundation Trustees publish findings on independent perception research

The Trustees of the IFRS ®  Foundation, responsible for the governance and oversight of the International Accounting Standards Board (Board), today published the findings of independent research commissioned to better understand stakeholder attitudes towards the work of the IFRS Foundation and the Board. The research found that the IFRS Foundation is perceived as being successful in achieving its public interest mission, and is highly rated for transparency, independence and professionalism. The research also identifies areas for further development, mainly around the complexity of its Standards, the timeliness of its standard-setting process and the need to respond quickly in a changing world. The research was conducted between February and May 2017 by Ebiquity, an independent research agency. Ebiquity interviewed 50 senior stakeholders from around the world. That research was then supplemented with online surveys of members of the IFRS Foundation’s advisory bod...
Post a Comment
Explore more »