Skip to main content

FASB tweaks leasing standard

The Financial Accounting Standards Board released a set of mostly minor revisions and technical corrections to the lease accounting standard.
The Codification Improvement to Topic 842, Leases, affects only narrow aspects of the previous guidance. FASB didn’t create a Transition Resource Group on the leasing standard, as it did with the revenue recognition and credit loss standards. But FASB and its staff have been helping stakeholders during the transition period until the standard takes effect in December for public companies responding to inquiries and eliciting feedback on potential implementation issues that could arise. The document addresses a number of those issues.
The lease accounting standard will put operating leases on the balance sheet of many companies for the first time ever, and there are some differences between FASB’s version of the standard for U.S. GAAP and the International Accounting Standards Board’s version for International Financial Reporting Standards.
The document lists a number of areas where improvements have now been made in the FASB standard, such as residual value guarantees, where a cross-reference has been corrected, and lessee reassessment of lease clarification. There the amendment clarifies that a rate implicit in the lease of zero should be used when applying the definition of the term “rate implicit in the lease” results in a rate that is less than zero.
Another amendment consolidates the requirements about lease classification reassessments into a single paragraph and describes how an entity should perform the lease classification reassessment, on the basis of the facts and circumstances, and the modified terms and conditions, if applicable, as of the date the reassessment is required.
FASB, GASB and FAF logos on the wall at headquarters in Norwalk, Connecticut

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Bond Listing

FMDQ OTC Securities Exchange provides an efficient platform for registration, listing, quotation and valuation of bonds. FMDQ through its trading and surveillance systems and and the publication of FMDQ Daily Quotations List has empowered the Nigerian sovereign bonds and other classes of bonds with price discovery, transparency and market integrity. Bonds listed and admitted on FMDQ are traded by its Dealing Members some of which act as primary dealers to the sovereign domestic bonds. FMDQ Dealing Members act as market makers to the Nigerian sovereign bonds and some other classes of bonds thereby providing trading liquidity to the Nigerian bond market. The OTC securities exchange is responsible for circa 100% of bonds traded in Nigeria. As part of its mandate to provide exceptional levels of information transparency, FMDQ provides continuous disclosure of relevant information on fixed income issues listed on its platform. This information includes amongst others – issue siz...

Funds Listing

As a debt capital-focused securities exchange, FMDQ also provides a robust platform for the listing of Mutual and Exchange Traded Funds. Mutual Funds   are investment vehicles operated by money managers, which typically pools funds from investors for the purpose of investing the funds in securities such as stocks, bonds, and money market instruments. They are also classified according to the types of securities invested in. Fixed Income Mutual Funds, which are focused primarily on investments in government and corporate bonds; and Money Market Mutual Funds (or Money Market Funds) which are focused on investments in short-term debt securities such as treasury bills and commercial papers, are permitted for listing and trading on FMDQ, in line with the provisions of the FMDQ Bond Listing and Quotation Rules. Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs)   are marketable securities that track an index, a commodity, bond, or a basket of assets. Unlike mutual funds, ETFs are traded on an exc...

IASB consults on the accounting for financial instruments with characteristics of equity

The International Accounting Standards Board (Board) today has published for public comment a  Discussion Paper  on how companies issuing financial instruments should classify them in their financial statements. IAS 32  Financial Instruments: Presentation  currently sets out how a company that issues financial instruments should distinguish financial liabilities from equity instruments. That distinction is important because the classification of the instruments affects how a company’s financial position and performance are depicted. IAS 32 works well for most financial instruments. However, continuing financial innovation means that some companies find it challenging to classify some complex financial instruments that combine some features of both debt—liabilities—and ordinary shares—equity instruments. Challenges in classifying these instruments can result in diverse accounting in practice, which in turn makes it difficult for investors to assess and...