Skip to main content

Top challenges for implementing the new revenue recognition rules

As companies prepare for the new revenue accounting standard that takes effect in 2018, there’s no shortage of apprehension among financial executives. Given both the impact of the forthcoming changes as well as the adjustments companies need to make, companies still have plenty of work to do.

Revenue recognition is a critical and often complex accounting area that companies can't afford to get wrong. Many boards and investors will want to know what to expect. Regulators will also be looking for increased disclosures throughout 2017 as adoption draws closer.

Given this backdrop, we included a question on the greatest challenges pertaining to the new regulation as part of a recent survey of more than 700 accounting and finance executives conducted by PwC and the Financial Executives Research Foundation. When asked to rank the difficulty of different revenue recognition implementation issues, a significant majority of respondents saw all of the issues as somewhat or very difficult, suggesting the overall complexities around the process.

With regard to ranking the difficulty of different revenue recognition implementation issues, contract reviews topped the list of concerns overall, per 78 percent of respondents. This is an important element of transition activities and it becomes more time consuming for companies as the number of individual and non-standard contracts increases. We’ve seen more than a few instances where companies are surprised by their volume of nonstandard contracts, leading to more effort than expected as well as challenges determining the right amount of "coverage" for documentation and audit purposes.

Developing and implementing new accounting policies, and documentation of the conversion process and associated auditability topped the list at numbers two and three, being cited by 76 percent of respondents, respectively. Other areas of concern included quantification of adjustments, project management, revisions to systems and internal controls, and identification of accounting differences across the organization.

In our experience, many of these issues aren’t initially evident until companies begin applying the new guidance to specific contracts and transactions. So time is of the essence for financial executives to develop a plan and begin educating their organizations on the forthcoming accounting changes. This should extend beyond the accounting department because the transition to the new guidance is more than an accounting change; sales and marketing, legal, tax, HR and IT all need to be at the table to understand the true implications to the organization of the change.

Getting this right the first time is paramount, and that's going to involve efforts from individuals throughout the organization. Awareness and action by a cross-functional team is critical to making the transition a success.

For a timely summary of where many of your peers are in the implementation process, the results of the survey have been summarized in our online data explorer, accessible here. We hope you find this information useful as you move forward with your implementation plans.

Author: Dusty Stallings is a partner in the Capital Markets and Advisory Services practice at PwC.

Reference: https://www.accountingtoday.com/opinion/top-challenges-for-implementing-the-new-revenue-recognition-rules

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Funds Listing

As a debt capital-focused securities exchange, FMDQ also provides a robust platform for the listing of Mutual and Exchange Traded Funds. Mutual Funds   are investment vehicles operated by money managers, which typically pools funds from investors for the purpose of investing the funds in securities such as stocks, bonds, and money market instruments. They are also classified according to the types of securities invested in. Fixed Income Mutual Funds, which are focused primarily on investments in government and corporate bonds; and Money Market Mutual Funds (or Money Market Funds) which are focused on investments in short-term debt securities such as treasury bills and commercial papers, are permitted for listing and trading on FMDQ, in line with the provisions of the FMDQ Bond Listing and Quotation Rules. Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs)   are marketable securities that track an index, a commodity, bond, or a basket of assets. Unlike mutual funds, ETFs are traded on an exc...
Post a Comment
Explore more »

Bond Listing

FMDQ OTC Securities Exchange provides an efficient platform for registration, listing, quotation and valuation of bonds. FMDQ through its trading and surveillance systems and and the publication of FMDQ Daily Quotations List has empowered the Nigerian sovereign bonds and other classes of bonds with price discovery, transparency and market integrity. Bonds listed and admitted on FMDQ are traded by its Dealing Members some of which act as primary dealers to the sovereign domestic bonds. FMDQ Dealing Members act as market makers to the Nigerian sovereign bonds and some other classes of bonds thereby providing trading liquidity to the Nigerian bond market. The OTC securities exchange is responsible for circa 100% of bonds traded in Nigeria. As part of its mandate to provide exceptional levels of information transparency, FMDQ provides continuous disclosure of relevant information on fixed income issues listed on its platform. This information includes amongst others – issue siz...
Post a Comment
Explore more »

IASB consults on the accounting for financial instruments with characteristics of equity

The International Accounting Standards Board (Board) today has published for public comment a  Discussion Paper  on how companies issuing financial instruments should classify them in their financial statements. IAS 32  Financial Instruments: Presentation  currently sets out how a company that issues financial instruments should distinguish financial liabilities from equity instruments. That distinction is important because the classification of the instruments affects how a company’s financial position and performance are depicted. IAS 32 works well for most financial instruments. However, continuing financial innovation means that some companies find it challenging to classify some complex financial instruments that combine some features of both debt—liabilities—and ordinary shares—equity instruments. Challenges in classifying these instruments can result in diverse accounting in practice, which in turn makes it difficult for investors to assess and...
Post a Comment
Explore more »